DuPlessis Orphans Ltr/Archbishop, Ontario Prime Min.

Keep The Ethical Light Burning, KELB, Inc.
Nationwide Membership
“We intend that man shall be free to live
by no man’s leave under the sun.”
Nuremberg Trials Conclusory Statement
. . .
May 28, 2014

Re: Canadian Orphans Demand Compensation for Sexual Abuse
and Torture By Catholic Church
Special News Release To The Arctic Beacon
Washington DC:

Dear Archbishop Lacroix:
(followed by letter to Prime Minister of Ontario, Kathleen Wynne)

Incidents in the lawsuit Rabi Abdullah, et al. v. Pfizer, Inc., occurred in 1996. In this case, the major issue at law, is non-consensual experimentation and Nuremberg Code violations, concerning Nigerian children, who were experimented on, without their informed consent. Based on the date of tis lawsuit, and its’ issues, it seems that many of the nationstates that attended the Nuremberg Trials, including the United States, learned little, from the decisions and resulting law, on informed consent, for human subject testing, that was created during these historic and precedent setting, trials (based on the abuses found in WWII German camps, such as Auschwitz and Bergen-Beltsen). The Nuremberg Code is international law.

Concurrently, in the same years, the DuPlessis orphan abuses, are one example of unchecked, violent and harmful non consensual human subject testing, that continued and remained, unchecked or stopped, by this precedent setting decision, at Nuremberg. Human rights violations need to be examined in the light of day now, (as opposed to the closed wards of the psychiatric institutions, all those years ago, where these infants and young children were unable to “call out“). These children, who are now adults, need to be compensated and “made whole”, as they bravely seek the justice and human rights, denied to them.

“Human and civil rights” are concepts written into State and International law. They intertwine and extend to the world’s public interest. They appear in the tenets of the International Declaration of Human Rights (United Nations). These concepts reinforce the Nuremberg Code, as an operative norm of legal justice. The legal norm we emphasize on this issue, is in the Nuremberg Code, and is the statement that “no human experimentation shall occur without the informed consent of the human subject.”

This legal “norm of practice” was severely violated with Clarissa, a DuPlessis orphan, as Mr. Levy notes in his article :
“Clarina was sexually abused by sisters at the St. Julien Hospital, she would be put in a straitjacket and attached with a collar around her neck and tied down on a steel bed during the abuse. In order to justify Clarina’s transfer from an Orphanage to a psychiatric Hospital at the age of 11 years old, the Roman Catholic order fabricated a false death certificate.. . .” 1.

These acts of abuse, on children in their care, at the hands of these nuns, medical doctors and intelligence agencies are beyond human comprehension. And these abuses remain still unaddressed, by both the governments of Canada and the United States. The victims of these egregious and abusive experiments have not been “made whole”.

Similarly, over 40 years later (!) in Rabi Abdullah, et al. v. Pfizer, Inc., 2. it was found that:

“. . .If a norm of customary international law, as the prohibition on non-consensual medical experimentation, occurs, a claim can proceed to trial.  This is one of the important findings in the case of  Rabi Abdullahi, et al. v. Pfizer, Inc., 05-4863 cv (L), 05-6768-cv(CON).

Judges Poole, Wesley and Parker stated that this prohibition “meets this standard because, among other reasons, it is specific, focused and accepted by nations around the world without significant exception“ (Rabi Abdullahi, et al. v. Pfizer, Inc., et al.).

Their decision further states that : “The evolution of the prohibition into a norm of customary international law began with the war crimes trials at Nuremberg. The United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom and France “acting in the interest of all the United Nations,” established the International Military Tribunal (“IMT”) through entry into the London Agreement of August 8, 1945. M. Cheriff Bassiouni et al., An Appraisal of Human Experimentation in International Law and Practice: The Need for International Regulation of Human Experimentation, 72 J.Crim. L. & Criminology
1597, 1640 & n. 220 (1981) (internal quotation marks omitted). (IBID).. . .”

The Nuremberg Code was one result of these war crimes trials. It unequivocably states that no human experimentation can occur without the informed consent of the human subject. The decision in this case illustrates the universal application of this code in national law.
In this case the American Pfizer Corporation tested Nigeran children with the drug Trovan and Ceflriaxone in 1996 without their consent.

In 2009, motions were decided on this case. Nuremberg was decided in 1947 (over 60 years earlier), as a result of the depraved German human experimentation in the camps, witnessed by the world, when the allies entered Germany. What a time spread !

It seems that there are those, in power, with power, who – – – seemingly, do not understand this universal and national law. The abuses, it seemed, continued. More quietly, but they continued, nonethless. The DuPlessis orphans and MKUltra survivors reach out for justice, now. We support and work with the DuPlessis Orphans and other MKUltra survivors.

The code determined at Nuremberg is law. The serious abuse that occurred in the orphanages and at the hands of the CIA and their doctors, needs remedy and it needs remedy, now. Nuremberg determined, among other things, that every life is precious and has value, as opposed to Hitler’s “lives not worthy of being lived”. This law, and human concept, apparently made little difference to the sisters at the DuPlessis Orphanages, the American CIA, who egregiously experimented on American children and others, who felt this law didn’t apply to them. It does. And we need to right this wrong, now.

Rights theorists demand that tenets of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (including the directive against torture) are honored, in cases of abuse. Any concept that finds, it is acceptable to hurt a small innocent group, for the greater good or benefit, of the larger group, “society”, for medical testing, or any other non-consensual testing outcomes, is unacceptable. This is the argument against utilitarianism and we firmly advocate for this philosophical tenant. These are bedrock tenants of law and humanistic philosophy, that we believe make recognition, resolution and the “making whole” of the DuPlessis Orphans and MKUltra survivors, imperative, now.

Thank you for your attention to this vital matter.

Very sincerely,
Lynn Bowne Weed,
Co-Chairwoman, Kelb, Inc.
Keep The Ethical Light Burning, Inc.
Non-profit Advocacy Against Non-consensual
experimentation and abuse
New York City Paralegal

Bowne House Historical Society Member
16th Generation of the John Bowne Family
Flushing, New York, U.S.
Harbored Quakers from persecution
Flushing Remonstrance, Forerunner to the
U.S. Bill of Rights
1. Dr. Jonathan Levy, Esq.
1629 K Street NW Suite 300
Washington DC 20006 USA
Tel/Fax 1-202-318-2406
chambers at brimstoneandcompany.com
rodvienneau at distributel.net
2. http://keepethicallightburning.org/pfizer-case/

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on DuPlessis Orphans Ltr/Archbishop, Ontario Prime Min.

Feinstein Ltr4/18/14

Re: Survivors of the CIA’s non-consensual experimentation and Fourth Amendment abuses

“Besides the constitutional implications, the CIA search may have violated the Fourth Amendment, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, as well as (an executive order), which bars the CIA from conducting domestic surveillance. . . “ Senator Diane Fienstein 1.

CANR supports this statement as well as Senator Wyden’s prior statement:on this issue
“. . .to address the Intelligence Community’s reliance on secret interpretations of surveillance law, arguing that while “intelligence agencies need to be able to conduct operations in secret, even secret operations need to be conducted within the bounds of established, publicly understood law.. . .” 1.
Our Issue: Defendants’ promise in the 1970s to locate the victims of their human experimentation program, and to provide compensation and health care, proved to be hollow. Defendants never made a sincere effort to locate the survivors. . . . (#15),
from Gordon Erspamer, Lead lawyer for Vietnam Veterans of America.
Their current case: Vietnam Veterans of America et al. v. CIA et al. CV 09-0037-CW,U.S.D.C. (N.D. Cal 2009) . i Quote from: Second Amended Order for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Under U.S. Constitution and Federal Statutes (Class Action), pp 8,9 # 13,14,15,16

Dear Senator Diane Fienstein:
Our organization, CANR, Citizens Against Nonconsensual Research, supports your position on this very important national issue. We ask that you look into a matter that denies Fourth Amendment protections to citizens, the issue of non-consensual experimentation. As a member of the Select Committee on Intelligence, and as one who is similarly concerned with Fourth Amendment rights’ denials, we seek your counsel, with these problems. We feel you are uniquely qualified to speak with us, give us direction and work towards a solution. We ask that you or your staff member respond to us, at your earliest possible convenience.
Our primary issue is non-consensual experimentation, including directed energy weapon testing, on unwitting citizens. A secondary issue are the FISA and Patriot “lists”. . In presenting the very nature of our issues and claims, many members believe they may have been placed on a FISA, or Patriot list and surveilled with some pretty harassing methods.
We are presenting here, expert signal evidence reports, witnessing unauthorized human experimentation, using directed energy transmitters. We include specific testimony, and clear infrared photograpy. This problem is nationwide, involving at least 2,000 citizens. Affected citizens include everyday people, professionals, whistleblowers, and earlier experimentation survivors.
There is apparent involvement of the intelligence/military, in a covert capacity, directing these actions. We believe this may involve activities of known mil/intel existing, contracting agencies, such as Blackwater (now Ze), Haliburton and others. The wrongdoings — illegal and harmful acts, include this secret experimentation, harassment, as well as attempts to discredit the complaining victim or whistle blowing parties.
The nature of this experimentation and the parties involved, lead many members to believe they may have been placed on a surveillance list: FISA, or Patriot, without cause. We believe that this list placement, acts as color of law, to cover and continue this experimentation.
We find your position on denial of Fourth Amendment rights, and abuses of the intelligence agencies to be humane, democratic, and lawful. When any governmental branch steps beyond lawful boundaries, or isn’t forthcoming with “secret” laws, senate investigation and oversight is vital. America is not and by democratic intention, never will be — totalitarian. Your intervention on this matter, ensures this. We are in support of your statements on Fourth Amendment abuses, and overreach by intelligence agency surveillance.
We are asking for your advice, guidance and support. No CANR member has any affiliation with any terrorist groups. Our members are everyday American citizens. We are presenting our issues and beliefs, in our letter to you and again, seek your advice, guidance and help.
Directed Energy Weapons/Devices
As a brief referenced overview of directed energy weapons and the problems these unsought “tests” present: EM energy is defined as the frequencies on the electromagnetic spectrum, microwaves, the infrared frequencies, radio waves, extremely low frequency (elf) and others. All EM energies are radiation.
Many everyday devices use EM transmissions to work. Our ipads, ipods, and cell phones use this technology, along with EM frequencies, microwaves, to transmit voices across the continent. WiFi’s and other computers transmit via EM and radio frequencies. The devices, themselves act as both receivers and senders. These are not traditional forms of energy (electric, with wires, or large engines, etc.). These small unique particles of light (microwave or other form of EM energy) are actually coded and transmitted between two devices (cell phones, iphones and others). The receiver device translates these small particles of light as sound. We see those traveling in the space shuttles communicating miles away with people in the control room, via EM transmissions.
While these devices have performed wonders for us, we need to always keep our ethical light burning. These devices can also be weaponized. They have also become the new “weapons” of war (sometimes referred to as non-lethal weapons). As was defined in the article “Wonder Weapons” (by Steven Aftergood) ii , they can work to attempt to control and harm the “enemy” whosoever that may be at a given time.
It is our belief that much of the development of these devices as weaponry, used non-consensual human subjects. Unfortunately the history of mil/intel non-consensual experimentation stretches back into the late 1930’s and early ‘40’s. These early years of development, were also the years of the Manhattan Project. The U.S. radiation experiments (1950 – 86) well exemplify the rush to scientific development, in this field, and its resultant unethical human experimentation and harms to individuals.
In her book, The Plutonium Files, Eileen Welsom chronicles the unlawful experimentation many Americans experienced at the hands of doctors and scientists they trusted. It was only years later, that the true nature of these harmful experiments were exposed.
These were years of mushrooming experimentation, (1932 – 1986 ?) which seemed to encourage or allow non-compliance with informed consent. Consequences of overlooking these inherent human rights, became the plight of victims of these non-consensual experiments. Victims endure physical and psychological harms as well as difficulties getting these problems appropriately addressed. We need to move forward, as a nation that honors ethics, and Constitutional guarantees, for all of its citizens. Admitting past (and possibly present) non-compliance, helps us do this.
The textual information in the Vets’ case is quite telling. “
The Plight of the “Volunteers”
1. This action chronicles a chilling tale of human experimentation, covert military
operations, and heretofore unchecked abuses of power by our own government.
. . .
9. . . .In at least a few instances, the victims died. Initially, the research program was limited to “defensive” purposes such as the testing of gas masks or development of antidotes, but it quickly was expanded to offensive uses with no practical limits and blatant disregard of required procedures.
10. Not only did DEFENDANTS repeatedly violate principles of ethics and human decency, as established by international law and convention through, among other pronouncements, the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki, but theybut they also violated their own regulations and the U.S. Constitution.
Bruce occasionally would regain consciousness for brief moments. On one such instance, he remembers being covered with a great deal of blood, and assumed it was his own, but did not really know the source. Also portions of his arms and the backs of his hand were blue. His wrist and ankles were bruised and
sore at the points where he had been strapped to the gurney. Bruce believes that this is the time period during which a septal implant was placed in his brain.
32. DEFENDANTS placed some sort of an implant in Bruce’s right ethmoid sinus
near the frontal lobe of his brain. The implant appears on CT scans as a “foreign body” of undetermined composition (perhaps plastic or some composite material) in in Bruce’s right ethmoid, as confirmed in a radiology report dated June 30, 2004.
33. Upon leaving Edgewood Arsenal, Bruce was debriefed by government personnel. Bruce was told to never talk about his experiences at Edgewood, and to forget about everything that he ever did, said or heard at Edgewood.
34. Within days or weeks of returning to Ft. George G. Meade, Bruce began to have trouble with his memory. For example, things as simple as filling out a maintenance report on his chopper and how to spell certain words suddenly became troublesome.”
Case4:09-cv-00037-CW Document31 Filed07/24/09 Page14 of 601

Click to access 20090724-First-Amended-Complaint.pdf

We don’t believe there are large numbers of consensual volunteers for this type of experimentation. Many of the veterans have suffered life-long physical problems due to this experimentation.
The Church Senate Subcommittee Hearings found these experiments to be unethical and illegal. As the hearings concluded, the CIA and the military were directed to find unwitting citizens, who had been experimented on and notify them of these tests in 1976. To date, it would seem that this has not happened. 3.
As can be clearly seen from the plaintiff’s information in the Vietnam Veterans’ case, the experimentation continued on, until at least 1966 (when Bruce’s implants were placed in his head.) The covert and non-consensual experimentation did not stop.
We represent a group of people who “remember” and who have found evidence of similar implantation. We are the “unwitting members of the public” who were experimented on. The Vets’ lawsuit is filed for military personnel who were consciously involved in MKUltra experimentation. As the Church SS noted, there were members of the unwitting public who were experimented on without their knowledge of consent. Many were children. We represent those children who are now adults, dealing with memories and personal invasions, such as implants.
Our group is formed to specifically deal with current and past abuses, and non-consensual testing, of directed energy weapons, and other testing, by the military/intelligence community and third party contractors, engaged. We also address the issue of “surveillance lists”. Many members may be on one, due to their activism on this very issue.
The transmission of EM energy from one point to another is silent and unseen. Using miniaturized portable devices, it is possible to test and harass a human subject in one apartment from another, in one room from another, in one building from another. Even though it is illegal, it is very hard to prove that a transmission of microwaves or EM signals, is occurring.
Some EM devices can cause human muscles to spasm, and vibrate, and it can cause nerve pain. This targeting, with bioelectric weapons, can occur in the individual’s home, workplace or on the street. These weapons, such as one that “tentanizes muscles” 3. as one might be walking into a store to shop, transmit silent unseen, electromagnetic energy, for a specific purpose (often some sort of targeted experimentation or harassment).
As you can well imagine, those of us subjected to this testing/harassment are suffering and experience pain and medical reactions. Many medical symptoms can be directly linked to overexposure to EM activity. Many require medical help due to the long-term effects of exposures to non-ionizing radiation. Intervention is imperative.
High levels of microwave transmitted to the head can cause a ringing or buzzing sound to occur. Long term exposures, to these devices can cause very painful migraine headaches,
kidney problems, cancer, changes at the cellular level (DNA “breaks” and problems with RNA performance), and other pathologies.
Military intelligence development of these devices, as weapons, has produced the taser, acoustic heterodyne, active denial system and other EM based weaponry. These weapons and devices, continue in their development. Our ipads, ipods and Blackberries combine the capabilities of computer databases and cellular telephones, using EM frequencies for transmission. These devices/weapons are losing their mystery. In 2012, many understand that their ipad operate by EM frequencies (no wires, no electrical connection necessary, “invisible” transmissions) as the DEWs we speak of. The user friendly aspects of the cell phone can be weaponized. These complaints have merit and are understandable.
The U.S. military spoke of “shock and awe” in its Iraqi military action. They refer to a device called the “Voice of God” to frighten Iraqi ground troops. This is a microwave audio (form of EM) transmission device. These are the types of directed energy (EM, MW) weapons our group complains of being exposed to, in seemingly mil/intel non-consensual experimentation.
We are enclosing and attaching infrared photographs of DEW transmissions from Judith Stringfield, a member in Hamburg, New York. (Judi has recently moved to New York from Tennessee.) She suffers from, and is victimized daily by these exposures. Judi served her country for over eleven years, as a member of the Air Force and has since worked in the private sector. Her resume is attached. (Please see Attachment 1: Photo’s and Resume, Judith Stringfield).
We also enclose and attach letters from William Bradford Taylor, (CT) private detective, hired by James Walbert, a victim, living in Kansas. This correspondence speaks of the detection and tracing of harmful microwave frequencies, James was experiencing, directed at him and his body. The letter finds the source of these harmful frequencies coming from a nearby apartment. This seems to be mostly the case in these instances, and the party involved, often when regarded, can be found to have ties (often indirectly) to either the intelligence agencies, the military, or a third party contractor through some conduit.
Nonconsensual Human Subject Testing, Unethical, Violates American Law
The nonconsensual testing, many citizens are experiencing is wrong: morally wrong. It is also a violation of national and international law. One goal is to get this stopped. Citizens must be notified of involvement in earlier, secret, CIA tests. Later human subjects, must also be notified by testing agencies of the military/intelligence. Our FOIA’s concerning list placement, must be answered.
We are working to get this stopped. We ask that you support our goals and speak with us to help our concentrated efforts to stop these violations of the human being, spirit and body. If the development of these devices does not proceed along ethical lines, and in accord with international law (developed upon exposure of outrageous abuses in Nazi Germany), human rights, as we now understand and enjoy them, are severely jeopardized.
The ethical consideration, “what kind of a world are we making and leaving for our children?” presents a very vital, real question in this situation. The very sustainability of civilization itself, is threatened by this continued unauthorized human subject testing and EM weapon development, in this manner. Current national and international laws need to be observed. Left unchecked, we believe these violations will involve our children, grandchildren and other innocent, unwitting and vulnerable populations. This needs to be stopped, now.
The Wilson Directive, the Nuremberg Code, 45 C.F.R. 46 (the Common Rule) and other laws, (including Executive Orders) and accepted norms of practice need to be adhered to. These activities need to be stopped, in accord with these rules, laws and international laws. We also would like full disclosure as to any “list” placement concerning our members and the methods necessary to be taken “off “ these lists.
We ask that you speak with us, concerning this situation and take our complaints and concerns, very seriously. Thank you for your kind attention to this problem.
Lynn Bowne Weed,
Paralegal, Co-Director, CANR
(347) 478 9582
Judith Stringfield, Co-Director, CANR
Please see Signatory Page.
Signatures, by “e” signature, verbal agreement and proxy.
Representing 45 Nationwide and by association, 200
1. Feinstein’s Quote from Huffington: Direct quote from Huffington: ” …Feinstein also said Tuesday that she is pushing the White House to find a way to release that classified 6,000-page report so that the public can learn what the CIA has done in its name.

“I have asked for an apology, and a recognition that this CIA search of computers used by this oversight committee was inappropriate. I have received neither,” Feinstein said. “Besides the constitutional implications, the CIA search may have violated the Fourth Amendment, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, as well as [an executive order], which bars the CIA from conducting domestic surveillance.”
i Quote from: Second Amended Order for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Under U.S. Constitution and Federal Statutes (Class Action), pp 8,9 # 13,14,15,16
ii. From:
1. From: http://www.wyden.senate.gov/priorities/secret-law
2. From: http://www.wyden.senate.gov/meet-ron/biography
3. Vietnam Veterans of America et al. v. CIA et al. CV 09-0037-CW,U.S.D.C. (N.D. Cal 2009), Second Amended Order for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Under U.S. Constitution and Federal Statutes (Class Action), pp 8,9 # 13,14,15,16. To wit:
#15. DEFENDANTS’ promise in the 1970s to locate the victims of their human
experimentation program, and to provide compensation and health care, proved to be hollow. DEFENDANTS never made a sincere effort to locate the survivors. . . .
To wit: #15.Defendants’ promise in the 1970s to locate the victims of their human
experimentation program, and to provide compensation and health care, proved to be hollow. Defendants never made a sincere effort to locate the survivors. . . .
from Gordon Erspamer, Lead lawyer for Vietnam Veterans of America.
Their current case: Vietnam Veterans of America et al. v. CIA et al. CV 09-0037-CW,U.S.D.C. (N.D. Cal 2009) . Quote from: Second Amended Order for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Under U.S. Constitution and Federal Statutes (Class Action), pp 8,9 # 13,14,15,16
cc: Quaker Peace Mission, United Nations
Benjamin Chaney, President, James Earl Chaney, Jr. Organization, Inc.
Attachments and Signature List: Contact administrators, Lynn, Judi, David
They were sent with the original letter and are available.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

DuPlessis Orphans Demand Inquiry/Precedent

DuPlessis Orphans Demand Legal Inquiry
and Long Awaited Justice
Mrs.Navanethem Pillay

High Commissioner for Human Rights

3 february 2014
Object:Demanding a Royal Independant Inquiry into the Duplessis orphans case

Madam Pillay,
The Commission for Victims of Crimes against Humanity in the Duplessis Orphans case, wrote you a letter dated the 25 December 2013, we haven’t recieve any acknowledgement from the United Nations Human Rights Council, nor from yourself madam Pillay, having said this, Duplessis orphan Paul St Aubin, a native indian from the Wôlinak Reserve near Three Rivers Quebec, Canada, came to see me asking that i write a letter to the Minister of Justice of Quebec Bertrand St Arnaud. Paul St Aubin’s letter was sent by Canada Post this morning, i’m sending you a copy of his testimony, also to the Prime Minister of Canada Stephen Harper will recieve his copy with this email, the media, and to Attorney Jonathan Levy Washington DC. Paul St Aubin was placed by a government institution to work slave labor on a farm for a period of six years, he was only 11 years old at the time, then, a Quebec Court sent Paul St Aubin to a Psychiatric Hospital and forgotten by the State for 18 years, governments & UN Officials must read his letter. We also recieved this ruling which came to our attention a few days ago, proving how children were targeted by different countries such as Ireland ; Canada ; United States ; who performed unauthorized medical experiments on children who should have been protected, Canada and the Province of Quebec both signed the International Declaration on Human Rights 1945, the other 1948, neither one of these governments protected the thousands of Duplessis orphans who were tortured and murdered, experiments ranging from lobotomies, electroshocks, Mkultra, beaten & whipped and imprisonment from months to years and falsely labeled mentally retarded. We are demanding a Royal Independant Inquiry into the Duplessis orphans case.

The victims need to recieve a positive acknowledgement from the United Nations Human Rights Council, we must say Bravo to this ruling in Ireland, the Duplessis orphans must obtain Justice.

Rod Vienneau
Commission pour les Victimes de
Crimes contre Humanité (CVCCH)
Dossier des Orphelins de Duplessis
Président du Comité les Enfants
de la Grande Noirceur (C.E.G.N.)
Auteur du Livre “Les Enfants de la Grande Noirceur”
Auteur, Compositeur, Interprète Album “Grand Pré”
Joliette, Qc

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on DuPlessis Orphans Demand Inquiry/Precedent

European Union Ct Ruling Precedent

Rod V. (Canada/activist) has just sent this important ruling from the European Union concerning church and state child abuse liability. Both have liability according to this high court. An especially important ruling for MKUltra abuse survivors. Please read this very important New York Times article.

“… The human rights ruling put the issue in a more responsible and just context. It presumably opens the government to hundreds more liability claims in Ireland, and possibly even in other nations where church and state allowed sexual abuse in schools to go unpunished. …”

It sets a legal precedent for both church and state to be held legally liable for child abuse and molestation. Yes, it is very pertinent to abuses at the DuPlessis Orphanages and MKUltra abuses in general. This is a very, very positive ruling that can be used with the Canadian and American abuses. So very glad they made this ruling in Ireland. Thank you for sending. Really good news, Rod. Glad.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Vets’ Press Article

Please Contact: Lynn Weed,
Test Vets Win Medical Care and “Notice”
by Lynn Weed
November 19, 2013 California

U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken (CA), today issued an injunction in the case of Vietnam Veterans of America, et al. v. CIA, et al., directing that the Army inform this national class of veteran test subjects, of the details and health effects of experiments performed on them while, they served as active duty military. These vets, from across the country * sued based on tests performed on them, at the Edgewood Arsenal base in Maryland, using allegedly more than 400 different chemical and biological substances. The tests occurred over a span of more than fifty years (1938 – 86) and involved tens of thousands of active duty military. The substances these veterans were tested with, ranged from drugs or chemicals (sarin, LSD, BZ, mustard gas and a THC analog called “red oil”) to biological weapon agents such as tulaaremia and Q-Fever.

Judge Claudia Wilken granted summary judgment that the Army has “an ongoing duty to warn members of the class about newly acquired information that may affect their well-being now and in the future as it becomes available,” and enjoined the Army to inform veterans about the nature, duration and possible health effects of the biological or chemical experiments. The Army is required to provide the court with a plan for notifying veterans about the experiments, within 90 days. The court also found that Army Regulation 70-25 “entitles Plaintiffs to medical care for any disabilities, injuries or illnesses suffered. Through this ruling, the vets can get the medical coverage needed for their illnesses and disabilities suffered.

While these are important claims decided for the plaintiff veterans, their initial claims also sought resolution on other issues, including medical care from the Army, itself, instead of the Veterans Administration. This reflects a general belief among enlisted people that the Army provides better medical care than the Veterans Administration. The vets have appealed this Summary Judgment Order, seeking their additional claims to be reassessed by the Appellate Court.

Surviving vets deal with post-traumatic stress disorder, and a variety of other diseases or disabling ailments, associated with the test substances.

The Nuremberg Code, the Wilson Directive and 45 C.F.R. 46 prohibit against human experimentation without the informed consent of the human subject. No medical facility, doctor, contractor or military person may experiment on humans without their informed consent.

The first Appellate date for the vets is Wednesday, December 4, 2013 when mediative forms will be due.

The Philadelphia Inquirer exposed similar military intelligence experiments performed on Holmesburg Prison inmates in PA, during the same years. These “Experimentation Survivors” were exposed to and tested with similar substances as the Vets. Pharmaceutical companies such as Johnson and Johnson and others made millions on the test results, while these prisoners were often paid “a dollar a day”, for using their bodies for experimentation. They now suffer the same or similar, disabling diseases and illnesses as the vets. Author Allen Hornblum wrote about these human “experiments” in his best selling book, Acres of Skin.
For more information: http://www.edgewoodtestvets.org
Lynn Weed, Paralegal, NYC
Able, CIDNY Newspaper Writer

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Vets’ Press Article


November 19, 2013 California
Vietnam Veterans of America, et al. v. CIA, et al. Judgment and Injunction

Below are some of the significant parts of the Judgment made on November 19 in the vets’ case.

Third Amended Complaint

Click to access 20101118-Third-Amended-Complaint.pdf

B. Summary of Action
21. This is a lawsuit for declaratory and injunctive relief in which Plaintiffs seek the
following equitable relief:

b. Injunctive relief enjoining DEFENDANTS, and anyone in concert with
them, from failing and refusing promptly to notify and provide medical care to Plaintiffs and class
members, and various other forms of injunctive relief, as prayed for below.
Pg 13


Click to access 20131119-546-Judgment.pdf

1. Judgment is entered for Plaintiffs on their claim, pursuant
to the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), that Defendant
Department of the Army (Army) has an ongoing duty to warn class
members of any information acquired after the last notice was
provided, and in the future, that may affect their well-being,
when that information becomes available (Notice Claim). The Court
declares that the Army has an obligation under AR 70-25 to warn
individuals who, while serving in the armed forces, were test
subjects in any testing program in which humans were exposed to
a chemical or biological substance for the purpose of studying or
observing the effects of such exposure (that was sponsored,
overseen, directed, funded, and/or conducted by the Department of
the Army) of any information acquired after the last notice was
provided, and in the future, that may affect their well-being,
when that information becomes available. Plaintiffs are entitled
to an injunction on that Notice Claim and such injunction shall
Pg. 2


Click to access 20131119-545-Injunction-Pursuant-To-SJ-Order.pdf

WHEREAS, the Court has granted Plaintiffs summary judgment
that Defendant Department of the Army has an ongoing duty to warn
members of the class about newly acquired information that may
affect their well-being now and in the future as it becomes
available, and good cause appearing therefor;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said Defendant is enjoined as follows:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Vets’CaseJudgment

Wash. D.C. Rally

Lynn Weed 001

D.C. Rally

Kelb Attends D.C. Rally with Restore the 4th, ACLU,Stop Watching Us and so many others

10/26/13 Washington, D.C.
The D.C. Rally was very successful, as far as we could see. There were about three thousand people (+) in attendance. Long blue silk like signs, high up in the air, joined the shorter hand held signs.

Our message was clear and the crowd was enthusiastic and intent. “Stop Watching Us !” was the message. Simple, sincere and “there”. Supporting organizations were: Stop Watching Us, Electronic Freedom Frontier, Restore the Fourth, Kelb, Inc., Partnership for Civil Justice Fund(PCJF), Thank You Ed Snowden.org,, and many others.

PCJF explained the core message well. They have :
“exposed domestic spying operations including thousands of pages of documents revealing how the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and other agencies used their “anti-terrorism” authority and funding to spy on and suppress peaceful protest movements in the United States; uncovered the implementation of a mass surveillance grid; and engaged in other litigation and government transparency work in defense of free speech, civil rights, and civil liberties.”

The group, “Restore the Fourth” explained the nationwide significance of the event: “. . . Hundreds of thousands of people have spoken out since the major NSA leaks began this June. More than 560,000 people took action at StopWatching.Us by signing our petition to the U.S. Congress. Dozens of members of Congress have introduced bills aimed at reining in the NSA, and hundreds of organizations and companies are uniting to end the NSA’s unconstitutional surveillance.. . .” (see link below:”Restore the Fourth”)
The petition is calling on Congress to take immediate action to put an end to the surveillance and “provide a full public accounting of the NSA’s and the FBI’s data collection programs.” Over 500,000 people have thus far added their signatures.
The rally comes at a crucial moment, on the 12th anniversary of the signing of the Patriot Act and as the Senate Intelligence Committee plans to take up legislation to revise the NSA’s spying authority.

“The American patriots participating in this protest understand the fundamental truth […]. . .” (See link below, Intellihub)

The “ThankYouEdSnowden” site well describes an important aspect of this problem:
“ The American people oppose the surveillance state, but have never had a say or a vote on it. The people have not given their consent to the government’s mass dragnet operation to collect, store and analyze their emails and their telephone calls. . . “
Kelb is in absolute agreement. We marched, carried signs and we applaud the efforts of PCJF , the EFF, Restore the Fourth and the ThankYouEdward Snowden, Mega groups and all groups involved in this vital work. The speakers also well articulated the problem and exhorted action.

Jesselyn Radack, a former Justice Department ethics advisor who is now a director with the Government Accountability Project, read a statement from Snowden to the crowd.
“This isn’t about red or blue party lines, and it definitely isn’t about lines, and it definitely isn’t about terrorism,” Snowden wrote. “It’s about being able to live in a free and open society.” He also noted that “elections are coming up, and we are watching you”. Members of Congress and government officials, he said, were supposed to be “public servants, not private investigators”.

As Ms Radack explained (paraphrasing) America now has the power and capability to put an electronic fence around the United States and any people it wants to. She explained, “they” are on your phone, on your computer, they know your most private thoughts. . . .”
Her advice ? : “Do nothing and this will continue to happen.” . . . Very rousing, and impressive. Points extremely well made.

Gary Johnson, 2012 Libertarian Party Candidate for President and Thomas Drake, former NSA whistleblower, and the legal representative for the ACLU, Shahid Bhutar and others spoke. They explained the capabilities these new technologies present. Gary Johnson explained that the fourth amendment was written to prevent unnecessary search and seizure, as Americans, as colonists, had suffered under the English soldiers. Very emotional and moving speech.
Thomas Drake, described the treachery some American agencies exhibit, when whistleblowers, such as himself and Edward Snowden reveal these atrocities. He caution against, “”acid turned up by the potent brew of secrecy and surveillance”.

He says he has been lucky, but many have been crushed under, by these agencies. Again a very moving speech and his warnings heard.

A very eloquent and powerful woman lawyer/speaker, representing the ACLU, on Saturday, explained that there is a new bill that only needs seven votes for passage. She explained the legal tenets that were being violated and spoke of the ACLU long and historical work on this major issue.

“Please call your senators and congress people.” she exhorted the listening and chanting crowd. “Tell them to vote for this bill: “USA Freedom Act “(Spying reform), by Michelle Richardson, Legislative Counsel, ACLU, Washington Legislative Office. Kelb supports this effort and we also, urge all members to call and urge your legislature to vote for passage of “USA Freedom Act.”

Shahid Buthar made a very logical and impassioned speech about the illegal abuses innocent Americans have suffered at the hands of the NSA and intelligence agencies.
One of the most “telling” comments made by those speaking, I thought, came from the Emcee. He said, “you think when you turn your cell phone “off”, it is “off”. You think when you turn your computer “off”, you have turned it “off”. You have not. “They” may well still be there, – our devices are actually “on” (in spite of our free choice to “turn them off”) and “they – NSA , etc.” are listening. “

I was thinking, “he is right”. We really aren’t making those choices. Due to the situation, “they” turn our devices “on and off”. Without our knowledge and consent. This is our country. Our Country. !

Read more:
Please choose one of these amazing and very pertinent links.  Chose one, two or many.  They all tell the story, our story that for so long, we have been presenting. 
View:     http://rt.com/usa/nsa-rally-mass-surveillance-786/

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Public Enquiry Needed/Duplessis Survivors

We worked with Rod V. in Quebec to prepare this letter and strongly urged request for a public inquiry into the MKUltra abuses and other abhorrent abuses, that occurred in these orphanages (1930’s – 1960’s +). Please view this letter on our mutual and vital concerns. We will get there.
Kelb, Board, Members, Writers, Editors

Re: DuPlessis Orphans, of the DuPlessis Orphanages,
of the Catholic Church: “Decree”

Dear Ministre de la Justice du Quebec, Monsieur Bertrand St. Arnaud:

Our organization, Kelb, Keep The Ethical Light Burning, Inc., has become aware of “The Duplessis Orphans Committee and the Programme Nationale de Reconciliation avec Les Orphelins de DuPlessis signed Decree # 1153-2001”, concerning the plight of the DuPlessis Orphans and other orphans placed into the care of the Catholic Church in Quebec (1930′ – 60’s +). Our organization deals with non-consensual experimentation, it’s abuses and some of the programs, which occurred both in Canada and the U.S., during the above named years.

From the “Quebec Ombudsman’s Report” of 1997, in which Ombudsman Daniel Jacoby produced an official report, in which the Orphans’ complaints were documented. He found evidence of such abuses as psychosurgery, electroshock, ice baths, beatings, straitjacketing, torture, sodomy and “unjustified confinement to a cell — sometimes for months or even years.”However, the Quebec attorney general announced in February 1995 that no charges would be brought. Mr. Jacoby stated, in reponse, “In almost all cases, the reasons invoked by the attorney general did nothing to deny the existence of the facts. Neither the statute of limitations nor the death of a suspect or complainant threw the alleged acts into question.”

And similarly, Dr. Hubert Wallot, a psychiatrist at the Saint Michel Archange psychiatric hospital at Beauport, (near Quebec City) found enough information to support the orphans’ case in his 1979 biography. When “Actualite-Medicale” reporter Michel Dongois asked about the Duplessis Orphans Dr. Wallot said, he supported the Orphans’ cause, and felt that a public inquiry was necessary.
Wallot wrote: “In 1948, two hospital workers tending for the sick patients ordered a young patient to wash the floor. The young boy refused, the two hospital workers killed the young boy.” This is in Dr. Hubert Wallot’s book, “La Danse autour du fou”, page 109).

There is much law on the legal abuses, concerning these “experiments”. Experimentation without informed consent, is illegal, nationally and internationally. U.S. Case law on this, goes back at least as far as 1923, with a decision by then Justice Cardozo (NY), on the illegality of this kind of “experimentation”. The Nuremberg Code is an accepted norm of practice, in Canada, in the U.S. and internationally.

The Declaration for Children’s Rights, proclaimed by the General Assembly of The United Nations Organisation 20 November 1959, (resolution 1386(XIV) Considering the necessity of a special protection for children (from 1929 Geneva Declaration on Children’s Rights): and adopted in the Declaration of Human Rights – one principal reads:
Children must be protected from all forms of negligence, cruelty, and exploitation, and Black Market of babies (selling). Children must not be used for cheap labour that could jeopardize the children’s health, his or hers education, and put in danger his or hers physical development, mental and moral.

This law was clearly violated and abused with these young, vulnerable Duplessis and Huberdeau orphans, housed by the Catholic church, who had already suffered great loss. These heinous, egregious abuses, must be addressed, whenever their inception. And rightfully, there is no statute of limitations, for crimes as egregious, as these. We applaud the government of Quebec for its actions, its understanding of human rights, the Declaration of Human Rights and its intentions in its work on the “Decree” for these survivors of the orphanages.

However, certain very glaring problems have appeared, with many of the involved professionals and their work (and intentions) on this decree, which are causing great legal concern. The problems are glaring enough and causing such concern, that an independent public inquiry, seems the best method to both obtain justice for the survivors and keep the outcome free from the taint of corruption and conflicts of interests This would show Quebec’s strong interest in inquiries into criminal behaviour (especially concerning children) which are free from taint, corruption and conflicts of interests.

The surviving DuPlessis orphans feel that only an independent public inquiry can effectively deal with these abuses, and their now historic intertwining in the politics of state, church and intelligence community activities in those years. It seems almost impossible to separate the good honest public officials from those with some connection to the Catholic Church, either then or now. Any lawyer will tell you that that in this situation, a “conflict of interest” is created, with resulting, “justice denied.” We don’t want to work from that position. We need to close this horrific chapter in Canada’s, the U.S.’s and other countries’ histories, as we work for an appropriate justice for the survivors of these atrocities.

An independent public inquiry may be the only way to get at the truth and give the victims, the justice, reparations and being “made whole” that they so sorely deserve.

On the concerns and glaring problems: the first, is the position Bruno Roy held, in the processing of this Decree, as President of The Orphanage Committee, a prime member with influence and “final say”. In a 11/3/01 issue of La Presse, Roy stated publicly that he had a conflict of interest in the Orphans case; because he was once in the priesthood, himself with the Catholic order, Clercs Saint Viateur between 1964-1970 He had not disclosed this involvement and association to the Orphans and the public. The Clercs Saint Viateurs kept numerous Duplessis Orphans at the St. George Orphanage in Joliette, Quebec. The question is clearly raised and perhaps answered: “how Roy could be an impartial representative when it came to exposing actions of Catholic church personnel and in particular, this group.”

The dogmatism and intense training of priests in the Catholic Church is well-known, world wide. To push aside these beliefs, held since childhood (and through a form of torture, Bruno Roy, himself, must have been exposed to), and work as an impartial member of such an important outcome for the victims of these abuses, is not only difficult, in the legal sense, it seems necessarily a recusable “conflict of interest”. He should have recused himself, very early on. He did not and became a prime player in the outcome of this “Decree” for the victims. This seems a clear, problematic and disturbing “conflict of interest” in the interest of justice, for these abused children (now adults).

One member of the orphanage committee notes: “The Decree stated that about 1,200 psychiatric Orphans having the false label of mental illness were registered. In 1999, the government of Quebec, entrusted to Bruno Roy’s committee the task of determining who was considered a Duplessis Orphan. This was odd. As the government was the body that had locked up the Orphans, certainly they would have had records of those whom they locked up. Yet, Roy agreed to work with the government to determine who was an Orphan and who was not.
If Roy had pushed to force the government to produce the records of those whom they had locked up, (in the orphanages) he would have had written proof of the illegal incarceration and fraudulent psychiatric labeling of the children. Yet another example of failing to respond in a way that would have best made a case for the Orphans. . .” .

So, something as important as identifying members of the group, in the mediation, was not effectively accomplished. Similarly the exclusion of the Huberdeau orphans, also housed by the Catholic nuns, priests and church, seems another example of both flawed reasoning and “conflict of interest”. This is our second problematic point causing legal concern.

These children were similarly placed in orphanages run by the Catholic Church in the same years. They experienced the same abuse and illegal medical experimentation, through those programs, as those in the Catholic DuPlessis Orphanages.

By legal reasoning, two people burned by the same person, in law, have the same perpetrator. Their claims, by definition and similarity (which is never “identical”, as we are taught in law classes) can create a “class”. These same tenets needed to hold true for both of these groups of abused orphans. To separate them, had the effect of watering down and minimizing the very valid and actionable claims of the Duplessis orphans. Again, this decision and its advocacy were made by a former priest, acting in a position of authority, on an issue, which to him would be controversial, one would think. This seems most clearly a misuse of the legal process, possibly based on a very strong conflict of interest. This separation of similar groups, with the same claims, is in need of remediation

A third point, very worthy of legal consideration, is the fact that many of these now adult DuPlessis orphans did not have access to the same educational benefits, many non-orphans did, in those years (due to the abuses and lifestyles they suffered). Therefore, with little education, their understanding of the legal process, and how the wrongs done to them could be addressed, were minimal at best.

To borrow from the tenets from a very pertinent code, and accepted norm of practice on this issue: “The Nuremberg Code”, in which it is firmly stated, that those addressed for experimentation must, by law, have a full and personal understanding of what they are about to experience.
If this has not occurred, the experimentation is then illegal, and unauthorized.

As these rights (of understanding what was happening to them in the years of experimentation and abuse) were denied, to these young vulnerable children, they should not again to be denied to them, now, in their later work for justice.
They have a lower educational level than most Canadians, due to what they experienced. They should not be denied the full process of law, because they may not understand certain facets of the law. There was not full explanation to them at the time, of what they were agreeing to, with this initial “Decree”. This also, would seem to be a major impediment to the justice offered and promised, by the offer of this mediative “Decree”. We would allege that justice is not served, when those seeking it, do not understand – what they are agreeing to.

For these very important legal points, we would allege that this Decree is seriously flawed and there is a strong need to move on to a better vehicle for justice, an independent public inquiry.

An independent public inquiry seems the best vehicle to more accurately, and effectively give the justice, these abused children (who experienced a most heinous non-consensual experimentation) deserve. And of course, this “more just” justice, always works for the the public good, as a deterrent. And also at the very least, a it serves as a ‘warning’ on the dangers of experimentation. As our former President William Clinton, noted (concerning the U.S.’s illegal radiation experiments exposure) : (paraphrasing) the advance of science is fast and breathless, yet we always need to “Keep our ethical light burning.” (his quote).

We sincerely, steadfastly agree with former President Clinton’s admonition. We believe an independent public inquiry is very much in order. And internationally, we will applaud you on your insistence on justice for vulnerable citizens.

Thank you for your attention to this very important matter.

Very sincerely,
Lynn Bowne Weed
NYC, U.S. Paralegal
Co-President, Kelb, Inc.
Keep The Ethical Light Burning, Inc.

15th Generation member of the “John Bowne” Quaker family, NY
Flushing Remonstrance (1657), Forerunner to the U.S. Bill of Rights
(347) 478-9582

Mr. Rod Vienneau
Commission pour les Victimes de 
Crimes contre Humanité (CVCCH)
Dossier des Orphelins de Duplessis
Président du Comité les Enfants
de la Grande Noirceur (C.E.G.N.)
Auteur du Livre “Les Enfants de la Grande Noirceur”
Auteur, Compositeur, Interprète Album “Grand Pré”
Joliette, Qc  J6E 2M8

Mr. Ben Chaney,
Director of the James Earle Chaney Org., Inc.,
“Freedom Riders”, Civil Rights Movement, U.S.

Mr. Allen Hornblum, author Acres of Skin, Holmesburg, PA,
illegal prison experimentation

Vietnam Veterans of America, et al. v. CIA, et al.

Guatemalan Non-consensual syphillis
Researcher Expose, Susan Reverby
United Nations

United Nations Quaker Peace Movement

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Aid Kelb/Nancy

Nancy wants her memories back.
And she wants to understand and deal with trauma,
she experienced in childhood.

Please donate to help MKUltra survivors, such as Nancy.
Donations accepted at: Http://www.paypal.com and please read on (next page).

If you are not associated with Paypal, an account can be opened using your email address. Once the account is opened, and you have reached the page asking for an email address to “send” to your intended recipient — Kelb’s email address is: lynnandmarie@live.com – the donation destination.

Your donation will be sent to our Kelb account to support and work on our issues.
We have an organizational donation page through our sister organization, CANR:

Please read on, to understand Nancy, who she is, and why she, and so many other American survivors,need help on this vital and much neglected issue.

Thank you. Kelb, Inc. Board and Members.

Keep The Ethical Light Burning, Kelb, Inc.
Keep The Ethical Light Burning, Kelb, Inc.

Kelb Members:

Kelb member, Nancy, (“Nancy” is a composite charactor, drawn from common experiences of MKUltra survivors) experiences fear, confusion and a sense of indeterminate dread, often. She has identified some of the sources of these reactions, in her adult life, but needs more help. She is one of the many (at least 36,000) Americans, who experienced MKUltra project testing, initiated by military psychiatrist, Sidney Gottlieb, in her childhood (1940’s – 1960’s). These “experiments” were an offshoot of McCarthyism: the “Red Scare”, which seemed to permeate many aspects of American life and intelligence agency efforts, in those years.

These “experiments” were performed on young American children. They seem a response to McCarthyism. Hoover and others, in those years, were suspicious that communist and insurgent communists, were using sophisticated infiltration techniques and employing invasive, persuasive psychological methods, to achieve their goals. These goals were considered antithetical to American ways of life. So, these military/intelligence “doctors” experimented on unwitting American children and tried to suppress their memories of these traumatic, and horrific tests.

These “tests” were identified in the Church Senate Committee Hearings (1974)and in the Radiation Experimentation Hearings. Nancy and many others want their memories back.

Our group, Kelb, Inc., “Keep The Ethical Light Burning”, is formed to deal with these issues; this unsolved American problem. Unethical experimentation was exposed in the Watergate scandal, and was a vital topic in subsequent Church Senate Subcommittee Hearings. In the ensuing years, it has not been dealt with, by any higher levels of government, or mil/intelligence agencies. We need help, to right the wrong and help the living survivors.

Our non-profit organization, Kelb is specifically concerned with is non-consensual or unauthorized human subject testing. We are especially concerned with programs and projects, which experimented on unwitting human subjects, including children (some as far back as 1938). These were the MKUltra projects of U.S. military/intelligence: Bluebird, Artichoke, Pandora, Chatter, and others, including the biological and chemical testing programs.

We have worked with survivors of the Holmsburg experimentation in Pennsylvania and we support and correspond with lawyers in the ongoing California lawsuit, concerning the non-consensual testing of military enlistees (years: 1942 – 1986: Case: Vietnam Veterans of America et al. v. CIA et al. CV 09-0037-CW,U.S.D.C. (N.D. Cal 2009)1.
Along with victim support and outreach, a long term goal is effective ethical and non-political oversight of the entire military intelligence community, as it currently exists. We want to put an end to the potential for recurrence of these heinous experiments.

It is illegal to experiment on anyone in this country without his or her informed consent. Forty five C.F.R. forty six clearly states that informed consent is a necessity. The Nuremberg Code established at the close of World War II, is the international legal standard for human experimentation. Violations of international law can be pleaded in the U.S. cases. The Wilson Directive (1953) is U.S. law clearly stating: human experimentation can occur only with the informed consent of the human subject. U.S. and international law is very clear.

Our mission is advocacy and support for victims of such as Nancy, and exposure of their plight. We also intend that survivor/victims we work with, be made “whole”.

One of the many memories Nancy is dealing with, begin with being taken to a church in the morning, as a child, in the south, in her teen years. She can remember very little of what happened in the church, on those days. She remembers leaving her home and later, going home. She has memories of the evening at home, but is finding it very difficult to recall anything that happened, during these times, in the church.

Another mysterious memory involves teenage trips to Fort Bragg, a military base, near where Nancy lives and grew up. Again, after spending the day on this military base, she can not remember what happened there. She remembers leaving and the night at home, but very little of the day. Therapists believe she may have been hypnotized and possibly drugged, to help suppress the memory. This may be very significant in dealing with, what was actually going on in her life.

We believe Nancy experienced MKUltra Project experimentation/testing.

This is common to our trauma survivors. It takes work to reveal these memories. Nancy spent her working life as a nurse and raising her daughter. She now lives with her sister and is parenting her daughter’s young son, while her daughter works. She is haunted by these memories and wants to further uncover and deal with them. She knows there is trauma, but reaching the actual events is proving difficult.

She is an active Kelb member and spends many days each week, generously giving her time, working on our issues. So much needs to be done. And most members are trauma survivors as Nancy is. Our common goals are to continue our lives, succeed in uncovering these memories and to work towards reparations, and being made “whole,” in spite of these common experiences of induced trauma. In researching this problem, many children were raped and tortured (Radiation Committee Testimonies, The CIA’s Search for the Manchurian Candidate, by John Marks). Hypnosis and drugs were used at the close of the “experimental” day, making it difficult for these “adults” to now remember, what happened during these times.

Many of our members are working with their private therapists, on these difficult, hurtful, life-impacting issues. We are looking for therapists to work with our group, group members and with our new members, who are just uncovering this abuse in their lives and looking for support. We welcome them, and we want to provide an adequate and helpful support system for them. This takes financial support. Our organization is a 501 (c) (3) non-p profit charity, incorporated in the state of Delaware and registered in New York State, as a charity.

Five dollars, ten dollars or a generous $100 donation will go a long way to helping Americans like, Nancy, who wants nothing more than to be made “whole”. She wants her memories back. Please work with us to help this group of Americans, who endured harmful experimentation, without their consent. To learn more about these issues, please visit us on the web at: http://www.keepethicallightburning.org.

A group member/therapist, who has treated many MKUltra survivors in her career, speaks of one haunting MKUltra experimentation survivor. This woman had recalled times of being held in a cage for days and being raped. The therapist recounts years of therapy, working with this survivor, which seemed to be progressing positively. One day she got an horrific telephone call. The survivor had committed suicide. We work that this not happen.
We represent many like Nancy. Nat, a northeast member has memories of almost being kidnapped as a child. His dreams and subconscious tell him that there was more to this. He is working with these memories and knowledge. David, whose last dramatic words from his dying mother, revealed to him, that he too, was an experimentation survivor. Her last words were exhortations of love, encouragement and warning. We work with many more experimental survivors. Please visit our website, read our mission statement and our pages. Our issues lie in our memories. Please help us work and make our groups members, whole. Please donate to Nancy, Nat, David and Kelb, Inc.
Donations gratefully accepted for Kelb at the PayPal website:
An account can be easily opened by accessing the website and following the steps.
When you have reached the page asking for an email address to “send” to your intended recipient — Kelb’s email address, our address is:
By entering this Kelb email address, your contribution will reach Kelb directly.
If you have any problems, please call Lynn, Co-Director at Kelb: (347) 478-9582 or Judi, Co-Director at (716) 866-4197. If you would like to donate by mail or directly to our Kelb account, please call either Lynn or Judi. Thank you so much. We appreciate your help and support for our issues.

Keep The Ethical Light Burning, Kelb, Inc.

1. Vietnam Veterans of America et al., v. CIA, et al. Second Amended Order for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Under U.S. Constitution and Federal Statutes (Class Action), pp 8,9 # 13,14,15,16. To wit:
#15. DEFENDANTS’ promise in the 1970s to locate the victims of their human
experimentation program, and to provide compensation and health care, proved to be hollow. DEFENDANTS never made a sincere effort to locate the survivors. . . .

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Aid Kelb/Nancy

DuPlessis Orph./BBC

Rod Vienneau’s wife Clara survived the DuPlessis Orphanage abuses in her young life. She  is a very brave and courageous woman to come forward with her story. The BBC has produced her story.  Please access this BBC “Outlook” account of this important part of MKUltra abuses which occurred in Canada and in the United States:


We thank both Rod and Clara for their continuous and courageous work on this issue which must be resolved.

Kelb Members, Board

In an update on their case at the International Criminal Court (ICC), we are publishing this letter from their lawyer to the Vatican.
Congregation for the Institutes of Consecrated Life

& Societies of Apostolic Life

Palazzo della Congregazioni


Fr. Sebastiano Paciolla, O.Cist

Piazza Pio XIII. 3

00193 Rome ITALY

Your reference: Prot. N. SpR. 953/2011

Dear Fr. Paciolla:

To assist you in evaluating the Petition Regarding the Duplessis Orphans, I am enclosing the following documents for your use:
1. Materials from the Canadian National Archives

2. Allocution of Jaques Hebert

3. Allocution of Dominique Bedard

4. Allocution of Dr. Jean Gaudreau

5. Allocution of Dr. Lazure

6. Allocution of Madame LeFebvre

7. Allocution of Leo-Paul Lauzon

8. Statutes of Quebec and related materials

We hope these official documents will help enlighten you about the gravity of the situation. It is our firm belief that final closure in this case may only come through the Church and the Holy Father.
Finally, I urge you above all to listen to the words of Quebec-born Clarina Duguay who is one of the Duplessis orphans: children born between the 1940s and 50s who were sent to psychiatric hospitals despite not being mentally ill. Clarina was forced to spend six and a half years in such a hospital and, as she told Jo Fidgen, the experience had a profound impact on her life.

of one of the Orphans. Ms. Duguay was interviewed by the BBC last month:


I urge you to take action now; these people have only a few years left. We are asking for your help in making the Orders involved understand the harm that was done to my clients.

Sincerely yours

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on DuPlessis Orph./BBC