Keep the Ethical Light Burning

https://www.mcgilltribune.com/mind-control-mcgill-mk-ultra/

Experimentation abuses believed funded by the CIA and nation of CA

The Allan Memorial Institute is located in an ominous mansion, formerly known as Ravenscrag, that looms over Rue McTavish at the foot of Mont Royal. The sinister stone building, said to be haunted, is befitting of the grisly experiment that occurred within its walls from 1957 to 1964: Project MK ULTRA. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) mind control project used unconsenting patients to test the effects of sensory deprivation, LSD, electroshock therapy, and other methods of controlling the human psyche. Although it may sound like something out of a dystopian sci-fi novel, these experiments were conducted at McGill, with devastating effects on the patients involved.

Project MK ULTRA was a large-scale attempt by the CIA to research behavioural modification and the effects of certain drugs and psychological treatments on the human mind. It consisted of 144 different subprojects related to the control of human behaviour, which were carried out in 89 different institutions, including universities. The experiments within each subproject varied in both their purpose and techniques—but many, including those undertaken at McGill, involved invasive and unethical research on unwitting human subjects.

The events of Project MK ULTRA are cloaked in mystery, as almost all of the records of the project were destroyed in 1973 by Richard Helms, the director of the CIA at the time.  Several boxes of records were subsequently uncovered in 1977, revealing sparse but important information regarding the nature of the experiments. Most of the information regarding the project comes from these files that were recovered, and from the Senate hearings that were held and which included interviews with former CIA employees involved in MK ULTRA. During the hearings, these members admitted to the purpose of the project, as well as the unethical nature of several of the experiments.

Media outlets in the 1960s and ’70s jumped on the story when it was revealed, sensationalizing  facts. This, combined with the few records that are still in existence, make the truth surrounding MK ULTRA murky.

Despite the shrouded nature of the project and the hazy details surrounding it, it is certain that unethical experiments were performed at many institutions, including McGill University.

Surveillance Comments from Congresspeople, U.S.

Their Opinions on U.S. Agency Surveillance of Citizens

 Wyden, Feinstein Comment.

and Human Rights Activists/Issues:

Plane Lists, Unconstitutional? Lawsuit

Associated Press
US judge: Terror watchlist violates constitutional rights
By MATTHEW BARAKAT, Associated Press 3 days ago
ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) — The government’s watchlist of more than 1 million people identified as “known or suspected terrorists” violates the constitutional rights of those placed on it, a federal judge ruled Wednesday.

The ruling from U.S. District Judge Anthony Trenga grants summary judgment to nearly two dozen Muslim U.S. citizens who had challenged the watchlist with the help of a Muslim civil-rights group, the Council on American-Islamic Relations…..

Read full article at link
Plane Lists, Unconstitutional? Lawsuit

If in agreement, Please Sign and Share:

Lynn-weed.squarespace.com

One noteworthy victim of Cointelpro activities was the actress Jean Seberg and her subsequent suicide.  13.   Because of her support for the Black Panther Party, actress Jean Seberg was targeted for ‘neutralization’ by the FBI’s COINTELPRO effort. SAC Richard W. Held, the author of the request, went on to become SAC San Francisco at the time of the bombing of Earth First activist Judi Bari. He subsequently retired from the Bureau to become Head of Security for Visa International. 19.All of these documents and many, many more can be found in The Cointelpro Papers by Ward Churchill and Jim Vander Wall (South End Press, 1990) ISBN 0-89608-359-4.

See Attachment for the FBI’s redacted memos. 

Concerning Jean Seberg, The Guardian states (April 25 2002): “More details are emerging of the FBI’s breathtaking smear campaign against actress Jean Seberg, a campaign which probably drove her to suicide. Duncan Campbell reports.  20.

More than 30 years ago, a small item appeared in a gossip column in the Los Angeles Times which suggested that a prominent American actress, who was married to a well-known European, was expecting the child of a leading Black Panther. The story was taken up by Newsweek, which identified the actress as Jean Seberg and her husband as Romain Gary, the French writer and diplomat. The Black Panther was Ray “Masai” Hewitt, the party’s minister of information.

Seberg was deeply upset by the story, gave birth prematurely and the child died after two days. The actress never fully recovered, say her friends, and she committed suicide. Now, the truth of how a malicious lie was planted by the FBI and its director J. Edgar Hoover is emerging.

Seberg, an actress known for her work in the play “The Mouse That Roared’, married Romain Gary, and became increasingly involved in radical American politics, most notably as a supporter of the Black Panther party, which Hoover was then describing as the greatest threat to internal security in the US. The FBI labelled Seberg as a radical for her involvement.” 21.

 The FBI was deeply involved in covert operations against “radicals”, whether they were leading protagonists such as Martin Luther King or minor players such as Seberg, who had given $US10,500 to the Panthers. Seberg’s phone was tapped. When, in 1970, the FBI discovered she was pregnant, it decided to see if it could spread a story through gossip columns that the father was Hewitt. 

An FBI memo, later disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act under the heading Counterintelligence Program Black Nationalist Hate Groups, Racial Intelligence – Black Panther Party, was sent to Hoover himself. “Bureau permission is requested to publicize the pregnancy of Jean Seberg, well-known movie actress, by [deleted] Black Panther party [deleted] by advising Hollywood gossip columnists in the Los Angeles area of the situation,” it read. “It is felt that the possible publication of Seberg’s plight could cause her embarrassment and serve to cheapen her image with the general public.”

The memo suggested that a letter from a fictitious person would plant the rumour with gossip columnists. Hoover approved the tactic, though he advised waiting until Seberg was visibly pregnant so she would not suspect her phone had been tapped. The first paper to bite was the LA Times whose gossip columnist, Joyce Haber, ran the story under the headline of Miss A Rates as Expectant Mother. Although the story did not name Seberg, it gave enough clues for people to identify her: “a handsome European picked her for his wife … the outgoing Miss A was pursuing a number of free-spirited causes, among them the black revolution . . . According [to] all those really ‘in’ international sources, topic A is the babe Miss A is expecting and its father. Papa’s said to be a rather prominent Black Panther.”

Haber’s column was syndicated across the US in more than 100 newspapers. It was not long before Newsweek picked it up and printed Seberg’s name. She was devastated.  22.

Seberg lost the baby. In 1979, she was found dead in a car in Paris having taken an overdose of barbiturates. She was 40, and by then married for a fourth time.

If in agreement, Please Sign and Share:

Lynn-weed.squarespace.com

Lynn-weed.squarespace.com

Repeal FISA

Repeal Foreign Intelligence Surveillance ActFISATitle 50, Chapter 36

The following “Repeal Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act FISA Title 50 Chapter 36” is Workproduct of Kelb, Inc., Keep The Ethical Light Burning, Keepkelb.wordpress.com.

Any resemblance noted, is coincidental. This Kelb Workproduct may not be copied in any form, reproduced, or copied, computer or social network copied and shared with any individual, nor any entity, unless with written permission from Lynn Weed, Director, Kelb. It is Kelb Workproduct.

Introduction

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, FISA seems a rebirth of the Cointelpro program and the Blacklist.  The elements of each are the same.  One’s placement in any of those programs is based on a subjective interpretation of everyday common events, at some point deemed anti-American or subversive (without a judge or jury). These same activities, originally called Cointelpro, now, have become secret, through Title 50 Chapter 36.

To be placed on the Blacklist (1956), an innocent comment, such as actor Will Geer made, praising the Russian theater, resulted in him being placed on the Blacklist.  This negatively impacted his acting career. Lucille Ball’s grandfather was on a Communist Party roll.  That got her placed on the “List”.  Similarly, in 2018, with FISA enacted, it is possible that one’s conversation with an Afghanistani or Iranian  taxi driver, about life and war, and one’s perceptions, could get one on the FISA list.

We all have thoughts on the theater, Russian or other, life, and war.  Should voicing them, put U.S. military intelligence in our bedrooms – and put us at the risk of directed energy surveillance devices/ weapons, which DARPA furnishes to military contractors doing the surveillance, as allowed by Title 50, Chapter 36? 1.

Normally, warrants require “probable cause”, that a crime is being planned or committed.  But FISA warrants do not.  They require only that the FBI show probable cause to believe that “the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power.”2.  This was the same prerequisite of the earlier Cointelpro activities.  Will Geer praised the Russian theater, therefore, “he must be a Communist.”  Flawed reasoning, then, had these people placed on a “list”, resulting in their lives and careers, being ruined.

Ramasastry at Findlaw, writes of this non-evidential process leading to surveillance: “Amazingly, even if the defendants move to suppress evidence resulting from the wiretaps and microphones from being offered at trial, they may still not have a chance to see the warrant applicants.  The government will show them only to a “FISA Judge” – along with the underlying evidence, and an affidavit from the U.S. Attorney General’s Office stating that releasing the material would harm national security.

If in agreement, Please Sign and Share
Thank you, Lynn
Lynn-weed.squarespace.com

Repeal Foreign Intelligence Surveillance ActFISATitle 50, Chapter 36

The following “Repeal Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act FISA Title 50 Chapter 36” is Workproduct of Kelb, Inc., Keep The Ethical Light Burning, Keepkelb.wordpress.com.

Any resemblance noted, is coincidental. This Kelb Workproduct may not be copied in any form, reproduced, or copied, computer or social network copied and shared with any individual, nor any entity, unless with written permission from Lynn Weed, Director, Kelb. It is Kelb Workproduct.

Introduction

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, FISA seems a rebirth of the Cointelpro program and the Blacklist.  The elements of each are the same.  One’s placement in any of those programs is based on a subjective interpretation of everyday common events, at some point deemed anti-American or subversive (without a judge or jury). These same activities, originally called Cointelpro, now, have become secret, through Title 50 Chapter 36.

To be placed on the Blacklist (1956), an innocent comment, such as actor Will Geer made, praising the Russian theater, resulted in him being placed on the Blacklist.  This negatively impacted his acting career. Lucille Ball’s grandfather was on a Communist Party roll.  That got her placed on the “List”.  Similarly, in 2018, with FISA enacted, it is possible that one’s conversation with an Afghanistani or Iranian  taxi driver, about life and war, and one’s perceptions, could get one on the FISA list.

We all have thoughts on the theater, Russian or other, life, and war.  Should voicing them, put U.S. military intelligence in our bedrooms – and put us at the risk of directed energy surveillance devices/ weapons, which DARPA furnishes to military contractors doing the surveillance, as allowed by Title 50, Chapter 36? 1.

Normally, warrants require “probable cause”, that a crime is being planned or committed.  But FISA warrants do not.  They require only that the FBI show probable cause to believe that “the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power.”2.  This was the same prerequisite of the earlier Cointelpro activities.  Will Geer praised the Russian theater, therefore, “he must be a Communist.”  Flawed reasoning, then, had these people placed on a “list”, resulting in their lives and careers, being ruined.

Ramasastry at Findlaw, writes of this non-evidential process leading to surveillance: “Amazingly, even if the defendants move to suppress evidence resulting from the wiretaps and microphones from being offered at trial, they may still not have a chance to see the warrant applicants.  The government will show them only to a “FISA Judge” – along with the underlying evidence, and an affidavit from the U.S. Attorney General’s Office stating that releasing the material would harm national security.

Repeal Foreign Intelligence Surveillance ActFISATitle 50, Chapter 36

The following “Repeal Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act FISA Title 50 Chapter 36” is Workproduct of Kelb, Inc., Keep The Ethical Light Burning, Keepkelb.wordpress.com.

Any resemblance noted, is coincidental. This Kelb Workproduct may not be copied in any form, reproduced, or copied, computer or social network copied and shared with any individual, nor any entity, unless with written permission from Lynn Weed, Director, Kelb. It is Kelb Workproduct.

Introduction

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, FISA seems a rebirth of the Cointelpro program and the Blacklist.  The elements of each are the same.  One’s placement in any of those programs is based on a subjective interpretation of everyday common events, at some point deemed anti-American or subversive (without a judge or jury). These same activities, originally called Cointelpro, now, have become secret, through Title 50 Chapter 36.

To be placed on the Blacklist (1956), an innocent comment, such as actor Will Geer made, praising the Russian theater, resulted in him being placed on the Blacklist.  This negatively impacted his acting career. Lucille Ball’s grandfather was on a Communist Party roll.  That got her placed on the “List”.  Similarly, in 2018, with FISA enacted, it is possible that one’s conversation with an Afghanistani or Iranian  taxi driver, about life and war, and one’s perceptions, could get one on the FISA list.

We all have thoughts on the theater, Russian or other, life, and war.  Should voicing them, put U.S. military intelligence in our bedrooms – and put us at the risk of directed energy surveillance devices/ weapons, which DARPA furnishes to military contractors doing the surveillance, as allowed by Title 50, Chapter 36? 1.

Normally, warrants require “probable cause”, that a crime is being planned or committed.  But FISA warrants do not.  They require only that the FBI show probable cause to believe that “the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power.”2.  This was the same prerequisite of the earlier Cointelpro activities.  Will Geer praised the Russian theater, therefore, “he must be a Communist.”  Flawed reasoning, then, had these people placed on a “list”, resulting in their lives and careers, being ruined.

Ramasastry at Findlaw, writes of this non-evidential process leading to surveillance: “Amazingly, even if the defendants move to suppress evidence resulting from the wiretaps and microphones from being offered at trial, they may still not have a chance to see the warrant applicants.  The government will show them only to a “FISA Judge” – along with the underlying evidence, and an affidavit from the U.S. Attorney General’s Office stating that releasing the material would harm national security.

Repeal Foreign Intelligence Surveillance ActFISATitle 50, Chapter 36

The following “Repeal Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act FISA Title 50 Chapter 36” is Workproduct of Kelb, Inc., Keep The Ethical Light Burning, Keepkelb.wordpress.com.

Any resemblance noted, is coincidental. This Kelb Workproduct may not be copied in any form, reproduced, or copied, computer or social network copied and shared with any individual, nor any entity, unless with written permission from Lynn Weed, Director, Kelb. It is Kelb Workproduct.

Introduction

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, FISA seems a rebirth of the Cointelpro program and the Blacklist.  The elements of each are the same.  One’s placement in any of those programs is based on a subjective interpretation of everyday common events, at some point deemed anti-American or subversive (without a judge or jury). These same activities, originally called Cointelpro, now, have become secret, through Title 50 Chapter 36.

To be placed on the Blacklist (1956), an innocent comment, such as actor Will Geer made, praising the Russian theater, resulted in him being placed on the Blacklist.  This negatively impacted his acting career. Lucille Ball’s grandfather was on a Communist Party roll.  That got her placed on the “List”.  Similarly, in 2018, with FISA enacted, it is possible that one’s conversation with an Afghanistani or Iranian  taxi driver, about life and war, and one’s perceptions, could get one on the FISA list.

We all have thoughts on the theater, Russian or other, life, and war.  Should voicing them, put U.S. military intelligence in our bedrooms – and put us at the risk of directed energy surveillance devices/ weapons, which DARPA furnishes to military contractors doing the surveillance, as allowed by Title 50, Chapter 36? 1.

Normally, warrants require “probable cause”, that a crime is being planned or committed.  But FISA warrants do not.  They require only that the FBI show probable cause to believe that “the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power.”2.  This was the same prerequisite of the earlier Cointelpro activities.  Will Geer praised the Russian theater, therefore, “he must be a Communist.”  Flawed reasoning, then, had these people placed on a “list”, resulting in their lives and careers, being ruined.

Ramasastry at Findlaw, writes of this non-evidential process leading to surveillance: “Amazingly, even if the defendants move to suppress evidence resulting from the wiretaps and microphones from being offered at trial, they may still not have a chance to see the warrant applicants.  The government will show them only to a “FISA Judge” – along with the underlying evidence, and an affidavit from the U.S. Attorney General’s Office stating that releasing the material would harm national security.

Repeal Foreign Intelligence Surveillance ActFISATitle 50, Chapter 36

The following “Repeal Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act FISA Title 50 Chapter 36” is Workproduct of Kelb, Inc., Keep The Ethical Light Burning, Keepkelb.wordpress.com.

Any resemblance noted, is coincidental. This Kelb Workproduct may not be copied in any form, reproduced, or copied, computer or social network copied and shared with any individual, nor any entity, unless with written permission from Lynn Weed, Director, Kelb. It is Kelb Workproduct.

Introduction

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, FISA seems a rebirth of the Cointelpro program and the Blacklist.  The elements of each are the same.  One’s placement in any of those programs is based on a subjective interpretation of everyday common events, at some point deemed anti-American or subversive (without a judge or jury). These same activities, originally called Cointelpro, now, have become secret, through Title 50 Chapter 36.

To be placed on the Blacklist (1956), an innocent comment, such as actor Will Geer made, praising the Russian theater, resulted in him being placed on the Blacklist.  This negatively impacted his acting career. Lucille Ball’s grandfather was on a Communist Party roll.  That got her placed on the “List”.  Similarly, in 2018, with FISA enacted, it is possible that one’s conversation with an Afghanistani or Iranian  taxi driver, about life and war, and one’s perceptions, could get one on the FISA list.

We all have thoughts on the theater, Russian or other, life, and war.  Should voicing them, put U.S. military intelligence in our bedrooms – and put us at the risk of directed energy surveillance devices/ weapons, which DARPA furnishes to military contractors doing the surveillance, as allowed by Title 50, Chapter 36? 1.

Normally, warrants require “probable cause”, that a crime is being planned or committed.  But FISA warrants do not.  They require only that the FBI show probable cause to believe that “the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power.”2.  This was the same prerequisite of the earlier Cointelpro activities.  Will Geer praised the Russian theater, therefore, “he must be a Communist.”  Flawed reasoning, then, had these people placed on a “list”, resulting in their lives and careers, being ruined.

Ramasastry at Findlaw, writes of this non-evidential process leading to surveillance: “Amazingly, even if the defendants move to suppress evidence resulting from the wiretaps and microphones from being offered at trial, they may still not have a chance to see the warrant applicants.  The government will show them only to a “FISA Judge” – along with the underlying evidence, and an affidavit from the U.S. Attorney General’s Office stating that releasing the material would harm national security.

Lynn-weed.squarespace.com

Dear Senator Paul:

Dear

Sydney Gottlieb/CIA

Frank Olson

http://www.wired.com/2010/04/0413mk-ultra-authorized/

1953: Central Intelligence Agency director Allen Dulles authorizes the MK-ULTRA project. The agency launches one of its most dubious covert programs ever, turning unsuspecting humans into guinea pigs for its research into mind-altering drugs.

More than a decade before psychologist Timothy Leary advocated the benefits of LSD and urged everyone to “turn on, tune in, drop out,” the CIA’s Technical Services Staff launched the highly classified project to study the mind-control effects of this and other psychedelic drugs, using unwitting U.S. and Canadian citizens as lab mice.

Dulles wanted to close the “brainwashing gap” that arose after the United States learned that American prisoners of war in Korea were subjected to mind-control techniques by their captors.

Loathe to be outdone by foreign enemies, the CIA sought, through its research, to devise a truth serum to enhance the interrogations of POWs and captured spies. The agency also wanted to develop techniques and drugs — such as “amnesia pills” — to create CIA superagents who would be immune to the mind-control efforts of adversaries.

CIA Torture Report

New York Times Outlines 7 Points

1. The C.I.A.’s interrogation techniques were more brutal and employed more extensively than the agency portrayed.

Citizens Against Nonconsensual Research
CANR
Nationwide Organization
Our issues:
non-consensual experimentation, legal compliance
“list” placement and DEW development transparency

Keep The Ethical Light Burning, Inc.

KELB, Inc.

March 1, 2015

Sent via U.S. postal mail and email

Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon
Washington, D.C. Office
221 Dirksen Senate Office Bldg.
Washington, D.C., 20510
tel (202) 224-5244
fax (202) 228-2717

Re: “Citizen Kill Lists” and Human Rights Activists/Issues

CANR and KELB supports Senator Wyden’s position: “. . .to address the Intelligence Community’s reliance on secret interpretations of surveillance law, arguing that while “intelligence agencies need to be able to conduct operations in secret, even secret operations need to be conducted within the bounds of established, publicly understood law.. . .” 1.

Our Issue: Defendants’ promise in the 1970s to locate the victims of their human experimentation program, and to provide compensation and health care, proved to be hollow. Defendants never made a sincere effort to locate the survivors. . . . (#15),
from Gordon Erspamer, Lead lawyer for Vietnam Veterans of America.
Their current case: Vietnam Veterans of America et al. v. CIA et al. CV 09-0037-CW,U.S.D.C. (N.D. Cal 2009) . i Quote from: Second Amended Order for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Under U.S. Constitution and Federal Statutes (Class Action), pp 8,9 # 13,14,15,16     2.

Senator Feinstein, Quote:        “Besides the constitutional implications, the CIA search may have violated the Fourth Amendment, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, as well as (an executive order), which bars the CIA from conducting domestic surveillance. . . “ Senator Diane Fienstein  3.

Dear Senator Wyden:

Our organizations, CANR, Citizens Against Nonconsensual Research,and Kelb, Inc. support your position on this very important national issue. At a time when mass surveillance is very much a current issue and problem, we seek assistance with a closely related issue.

Issues which are problematic to us concern non-consensual experimentation. As a member of the Select Committee on Intelligence, and as one who defies, “ the national security community’s abuse of secrecy” “2.,  we seek your counsel, with these problems. We feel you are uniquely qualified to speak with us, give us direction and work towards a solution. We ask that you or your staff member respond to us, at your earliest possible convenience.

Our primary issue is non-consensual experimentation, including directed energy weapon testing, on unwitting citizens. We are presenting here, expert signal evidence reports, witnessing unauthorized human experimentation, using directed energy transmitters. We include specific testimony, and clear infrared photograpy. This problem is nationwide, involving at least 2,000 citizens. Affected citizens include everyday people, professionals, whistleblowers, and earlier experimentation survivors.

There is apparent involvement of the intelligence/military, in a covert capacity, directing these actions. We believe this may involve activities of known mil/intel existing, contracting agencies, such as Blackwater (now Ze), Haliburton and others. The wrongdoings — illegal and harmful acts, include this secret experimentation, harassment, as well as attempts to discredit the complaining victim or whistle blowing parties.

We believe that this placement, either on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act list (FISA) or Patriot Act list, acts as color of law, to cover and continue this experimentation. We find your position on the list placements to be humane, democratic, and lawful. When any governmental branch steps beyond lawful boundaries, or isn’t forthcoming with “secret” laws, senate investigation and oversight is vital. America is not and by democratic intention, never will be — totalitarian. Your intervention on this matter, ensures this.

We are asking for your advice, guidance and support. No CANR member has any affiliation with any terrorist groups. Our members are everyday American citizens. We are presenting our issues and beliefs, in our letter to you and again, seek your advice, guidance and help.

Directed Energy Weapons/Devices

As a brief referenced overview of directed energy weapons and the problems these unsought “tests” present: EM energy is defined as the frequencies on the electromagnetic spectrum, microwaves, the infrared frequencies, radio waves, extremely low frequency (elf) and others. All EM energies are radiation.

Many everyday devices use EM transmissions to work. Our ipads, ipods, and cell phones use this technology, along with EM frequencies, microwaves, to transmit voices across the continent. WiFi’s and other computers transmit via EM and radio frequencies. The devices, themselves act as both receivers and senders. These are not traditional forms of energy (electric, with wires, or large engines, etc.). These small unique particles of light (microwave or other form of EM energy) are actually coded and transmitted between two devices (cell phones, iphones and others). The receiver device translates these small particles of light as sound. We see those traveling in the space shuttles communicating miles away with people in the control room, via EM transmissions.

While these devices have performed wonders for us, we need to always keep our ethical light burning. These devices can also be weaponized. They have also become the new “weapons” of war (sometimes referred to as non-lethal weapons). As was defined in the article “Wonder Weapons” (by Steven Aftergood) ii , they can work to attempt to control and harm the “enemy” whosoever that may be at a given time.

It is our belief that much of the development of these devices as weaponry, used non-consensual human subjects. Unfortunately the history of mil/intel non-consensual experimentation stretches back into the late 1930’s and early ‘40’s. These early years of development, were also the years of the Manhattan Project. The U.S. radiation experiments (1950 – 86) well exemplify the rush to scientific development, in this field, and its resultant unethical human experimentation and harms to individuals.

In her book, The Plutonium Files, Eileen Welsom chronicles the unlawful experimentation many Americans experienced at the hands of doctors and scientists they trusted. It was only years later, that the true nature of these harmful experiments were exposed.

These were years of mushrooming experimentation, (1932 – 1986 ?) which seemed to encourage or allow non-compliance with informed consent. Consequences of overlooking these inherent human rights, became the plight of victims of these non-consensual experiments. Victims endure physical and psychological harms as well as difficulties getting these problems appropriately addressed. We need to move forward, as a nation that honors ethics, and Constitutional guarantees, for all of its citizens. Admitting past (and possibly present) non-compliance, helps us do this.

The textual information in the Vets’ case is quite telling. “

The Plight of the “Volunteers”
1. This action chronicles a chilling tale of human experimentation, covert military
operations, and heretofore unchecked abuses of power by our own government.

. . .

9. . . .In at least a few instances, the victims died. Initially, the research program was limited to “defensive” purposes such as the testing of gas masks or development of antidotes, but it quickly was expanded to offensive uses with no practical limits and blatant disregard of required procedures.
   10. Not only did DEFENDANTS repeatedly violate principles of ethics and human decency, as established by international law and convention through, among other pronouncements, the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki, but theybut they also violated their own regulations and the U.S. Constitution.

Bruce occasionally would regain consciousness for brief moments. On one such instance, he remembers being covered with a great deal of blood, and assumed it was his own, but did not really know the source. Also portions of his arms and the backs of his hand were blue. His wrist and ankles were bruised and
sore at the points where he had been strapped to the gurney. Bruce believes that this is the time period during which a septal implant was placed in his brain.
32. DEFENDANTS placed some sort of an implant in Bruce’s right ethmoid sinus
near the frontal lobe of his brain. The implant appears on CT scans as a “foreign body” of undetermined composition (perhaps plastic or some composite material) in in Bruce’s right ethmoid, as confirmed in a radiology report dated June 30, 2004.
33. Upon leaving Edgewood Arsenal, Bruce was debriefed by government personnel. Bruce was told to never talk about his experiences at Edgewood, and to forget about everything that he ever did, said or heard at Edgewood.
34. Within days or weeks of returning to Ft. George G. Meade, Bruce began to have trouble with his memory. For example, things as simple as filling out a maintenance report on his chopper and how to spell certain words suddenly became troublesome.”
Case4:09-cv-00037-CW Document31 Filed07/24/09 Page14 of 601
http://edgewoodtestvets.org/court-filed-documents/pdfs/20090724-First-Amended-Complaint.pdf

We don’t believe there are large numbers of consensual volunteers for this type of experimentation. Many of the veterans have suffered life-long physical problems due to this experimentation.

The Church Senate Subcommittee Hearings found these experiments to be unethical and illegal. As the hearings concluded, the CIA and the military were directed to find unwitting citizens, who had been experimented on and notify them of these tests in 1976. To date, it would seem that this has not happened. 3.

As can be clearly seen from the plaintiff’s information in the Vietnam Veterans’ case, the experimentation continued on, until at least 1966 (when Bruce’s implants were placed in his head.) The covert and non-consensual experimentation did not stop.

We represent a group of people who “remember” and who have found evidence of similar implantation. We are the “unwitting members of the public” who were experimented on. The Vets’ lawsuit is filed for military personnel who were consciously involved in MKUltra experimentation. As the Church SS noted, there were members of the unwitting public who were experimented on without their knowledge of consent. Many were children. We represent those children who are now adults, dealing with memories and personal invasions, such as implants.

Our group is formed to specifically deal with current and past abuses, and non-consensual testing, of directed energy weapons, and other testing, by the military/intelligence community and third party contractors, engaged. We also address the issue of “surveillance lists”. Many members may be on one, due to their activism on this very issue.

The transmission of EM energy from one point to another is silent and unseen. Using miniaturized portable devices, it is possible to test and harass a human subject in one apartment from another, in one room from another, in one building from another. Even though it is illegal, it is very hard to prove that a transmission of microwaves or EM signals, is occurring.

Some EM devices can cause human muscles to spasm, and vibrate, and it can cause nerve pain. This targeting, with bioelectric weapons, can occur in the individual’s home, workplace or on the street. These weapons, such as one that “tentanizes muscles” 3. as one might be walking into a store to shop, transmit silent unseen, electromagnetic energy, for a specific purpose (often some sort of targeted experimentation or harassment).

As you can well imagine, those of us subjected to this testing/harassment are suffering and experience pain and medical reactions. Many medical symptoms can be directly linked to overexposure to EM activity. Many require medical help due to the long-term effects of exposures to non-ionizing radiation. Intervention is imperative.

High levels of microwave transmitted to the head can cause a ringing or buzzing sound to occur. Long term exposures, to these devices can cause very painful migraine headaches,
kidney problems, cancer, changes at the cellular level (DNA “breaks” and problems with RNA performance), and other pathologies.

Military intelligence development of these devices, as weapons, has produced the taser, acoustic heterodyne, active denial system and other EM based weaponry. These weapons and devices, continue in their development. Our ipads, ipods and Blackberries combine the capabilities of computer databases and cellular telephones, using EM frequencies for transmission. These devices/weapons are losing their mystery. In 2012, many understand that their ipad operate by EM frequencies (no wires, no electrical connection necessary, “invisible” transmissions) as the DEWs we speak of. The user friendly aspects of the cell phone can be weaponized. These complaints have merit and are understandable.

The U.S. military spoke of “shock and awe” in its Iraqi military action. They refer to a device called the “Voice of God” to frighten Iraqi ground troops. This is a microwave audio (form of EM) transmission device. These are the types of directed energy (EM, MW) weapons our group complains of being exposed to, in seemingly mil/intel non-consensual experimentation.

We are enclosing and attaching infrared photographs of DEW transmissions from Judith Stringfield, a member in Hamburg, New York. (Judi has recently moved to New York from Tennessee.) She suffers from, and is victimized daily by these exposures. Judi served her country for over eleven years, as a member of the Air Force and has since worked in the private sector. Her resume is attached. (Please see Attachment 1: Photo’s and Resume, Judith Stringfield).

We also enclose and attach letters from William Bradford Taylor, (CT) private detective, hired by James Walbert, a victim, living in Kansas. This correspondence speaks of the detection and tracing of harmful microwave frequencies, James was experiencing, directed at him and his body. The letter finds the source of these harmful frequencies coming from a nearby apartment. This seems to be mostly the case in these instances, and the party involved, often when regarded, can be found to have ties (often indirectly) to either the intelligence agencies, the military, or a third party contractor through some conduit.

Nonconsensual Human Subject Testing, Unethical, Violates American Law

The nonconsensual testing, many citizens are experiencing is wrong: morally wrong. It is also a violation of national and international law. One goal is to get this stopped. Citizens must be notified of involvement in earlier, secret, CIA tests. Later human subjects, must also be notified by testing agencies of the military/intelligence. Our FOIA’s concerning list placement, must be answered.

We are working to get this stopped. We ask that you support our goals and speak with us to help our concentrated efforts to stop these violations of the human being, spirit and body. If the development of these devices does not proceed along ethical lines, and in accord with international law (developed upon exposure of outrageous abuses in Nazi Germany), human rights, as we now understand and enjoy them, are severely jeopardized.

The ethical consideration, “what kind of a world are we making and leaving for our children?” presents a very vital, real question in this situation. The very sustainability of civilization itself, is threatened by this continued unauthorized human subject testing and EM weapon development, in this manner. Current national and international laws need to be observed. Left unchecked, we believe these violations will involve our children, grandchildren and other innocent, unwitting and vulnerable populations. This needs to be stopped, now.

The Wilson Directive, the Nuremberg Code, 45 C.F.R. 46 (the Common Rule) and other laws, (including Executive Orders) and accepted norms of practice need to be adhered to. These activities need to be stopped, in accord with these rules, laws and international laws. We also would like full disclosure as to any “list” placement concerning our members and the methods necessary to be taken “off “ these lists.

We ask that you speak with us, concerning this situation and take our complaints and concerns, very seriously. Thank you for your kind attention to this problem.

Sincerely,

Lynn Bowne Weed,
Paralegal, Co-Director, CANR
lynnandmarie@live.com
(347) 478 9582

Judith Stringfield, Co-Director, CANR
Jstringfield125@gmail.com
Website:
http://www.CANRnonconsensual.weebly.com

Please see Signatory Page.
Signatures, by “e” signature, verbal agreement and proxy.
Representing 45 Nationwide and by association, 200

Notes:
i Quote from: Second Amended Order for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Under U.S. Constitution and Federal Statutes (Class Action), pp 8,9 # 13,14,15,16
ii. From:

1. From: http://www.wyden.senate.gov/meet-ron/biography
2. Vietnam Veterans of America et al. v. CIA et al. CV 09-0037-CW,U.S.D.C. (N.D. Cal 2009), Second Amended Order for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Under U.S. Constitution and Federal Statutes (Class Action), pp 8,9 # 13,14,15,16. To wit:
#15. DEFENDANTS’ promise in the 1970s to locate the victims of their human
experimentation program, and to provide compensation and health care, proved to be hollow. DEFENDANTS never made a sincere effort to locate the survivors. . . .

3. From: http://www.wyden.senate.gov/priorities/secret-law

_____________________________________________

Attachments

Reference 1:
Photo’s and Resume, Judith Stringfield, Hamburg, New York (Recently moved from Tennessee. Photo’s are of Judi when she was living in her home in TN, 2009.)
She continues to experience these Directed Energy Weapon/Device exposures.
Ms. Stringfield’s photographs of these abuses are available on the hard copy of this document which we mailed with the original of this letter and which was received by your Washington D.C. office on September 15, 2012. She prefers that they not be transmitted via email transmission.

A brief description of one photo : Ms. Stringfield is standing outside of her house in Tennessee and the beam of light with a large ball of light is penetrating her head. These are silent unseen transmissions. They can be captured using an expensive infrared camera, which will pick up this “light”.

Reference 2:
James Walbert, Kansas: Letters from Representative James O. Guest, Letters from P.I. William Bradford Taylor and Restraining Order granted by a Kansas Judge on Behalf of James Walbert Letters.

08DM864 COPY

The Great Seal of the State of Missouri

JAMES O. GUEST
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
DISTRICT ADDRESS

P.O. Box 412
King City, MO 64463

Tele: 660-535-6664

To Whom It May Concern:

I have worked for 3 years with Microwave and Electronic Harassment victims throughout the U.S. and overseas. It is hard for others to understand the technology that is being used to destroy people’s lives. I know James because he contacted me for help. James has worked to find proof of what has happened to him.

Many victims try hard to get help from professional doctors to help find devices such as Veri-Chip. I would request that you and those that can make a difference would help James and others to find answers.

/s/
Jim Guest
5th District State Representative

cc: re-entered text from original.

The William J. Taylor Agency Investigations
CT State License
FL State License
Investigations
Security Counseling

November 21, 2008

To whom it may concern,

The undersigned is a licensed Private Investigator, licensed in the state of Florida and the state of Connecticut. The undersigned is not an expert in electronics nor an electrical engineer certified to conduct these issues. The undersigned has however been successfully locating and identifying electronic devices that are designed to eavesdrop in individuals and harass for numerous known and unknown reasons for over forty years. References are available on request.

On or about 1500 on January 6, 2008, the undersigned met with and interviewed Mr. James Walbert of Wichita, Kansas. Mr. Walbert related to the undersigned that he believed he had been subjected to various forms of electronic surveillance and electronic harassment by persons known or unknown to him, for reasons known or unknown to him. (I shall not violate Mr. Walbert’s confidence by memorializing his suspicions in this report as Mr. Walbert is involved in a legal matter relating to this harassment.)

During the course of the afternoon of the 6th of January 2008, the undersigned tested Mr. Walbert’s person for radiation using a JM-20PRO, 1MHz – 3GHz. Portable R.F. Detector and a JM-20F RF Finder Bar Graph Display RF Frequency Detector.

The undersigned found that the JM-20PRO detected a low signal coming from Mr. Walbert’s right upper back area of his person. Upon scanning Mr. Walbert with the JM-20F the undersigned found a low bandwidth signal of a fairly steady 288MHz. (A background signal of the area was 800 to 900 MHz.)

It is also worthy of mention that while viewing Mr. Walbert through a Bushnell 26 4202G Night Vision Infrared Viewer there was a very definite visual distortion of light on Mr. Walbert’s back area.

These tests and results were witnessed by a credible third party with the permission of Mr. Walbert.

Respectfully,

William Johnstone Taylor, LPI

Post Office Box 878
DeLand, FL 43721-0878
Phone (386) 738-2233
Fax (386) 822-9876
experimentation program, and to provide compensation and health care, proved to be hollow. DEFENDANTS never made a sincere effort to locate the survivors. . . .